MRegrets@nas.edu

SV: Re: US government accounting for R&D as share- ofeconomic growth

Sent by: Lennart Elg Percentage that have been commercialized is not a good indicator - it assum=es that the underlying distribution of outcomes is reasonably normal, but i


Re: US government accounting for R&D as share- ofeconomic growth

Sent by: "Voytek, Kenneth P." The national academies of science did a pretty thorough study of SBIR and few years back.-----Original Message-----From: Fiore, Steve [mailto


Re: US government accounting for R&D as share- ofeconomic growth

Sent by: "Fiore, Steve" On a related note, does anyone know of any analyses of the federal governme=nt=92s SBIR/STTR programs?


Re: US government accounting for R&D as share of- economic growth

Sent by: "Regets, Mark" Thanks Carol,I think we are saying the same thing. In no way do I want to imply that t=he R&E satellite accounts are not a good thing to do.


Syndicate content