MRegrets@nas.edu
Re: US government accounting for R&D as share of- economic growth
Sent by: "Regets, Mark" Thanks Carol,I think we are saying the same thing. In no way do I want to imply that t=he R&E satellite accounts are not a good thing to do.
Re: US government accounting for R&D as share of economic growth
Sent by: "Robbins, Carol" SciSIP, Mark's point about the information needed about R&D for science policymakes sense.
Re: US government accounting for R&D as share- ofeconomic growth
Sent by: "Merrill, Steve" Steve: The Academies recently completed an extensive evaluation of the fiv=e largest SBIR programs -- DOD, DOE, NSF, NIH, and NASA -- as well as a cro=
SV: Re: US government accounting for R&D as share- ofeconomic growth
Sent by: Lennart Elg Percentage that have been commercialized is not a good indicator - it assum=es that the underlying distribution of outcomes is reasonably normal, but i
Re: US government accounting for R&D as share of- economic growth
Sent by: "Falk-Krzesinski, Holly FSM" The Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO; www.bio.org) may also have da=ta to share.Holly***************************************H
Re: US government accounting for R&D as share- ofeconomic growth
Sent by: "Voytek, Kenneth P." The national academies of science did a pretty thorough study of SBIR and few years back.-----Original Message-----From: Fiore, Steve [mailto
Re: US government accounting for R&D as share- ofeconomic growth
Sent by: "Fiore, Steve" On a related note, does anyone know of any analyses of the federal governme=nt=92s SBIR/STTR programs?
