Texas
[scisip] NSF workshop on Transformative Research
Hello,
Those on the list into twitter may be interested in keeping an eye on the hashtag #NSFTR today and early tomorrow.
Re-assessing the science – society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation’s broader impacts merit review criterion (1997 – 2011)
In 2005, I published the first scholarly article on the US National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Merit Review Criterion.
[scisip] Book Reviewers Requested (Please do not reply to the list)
Greetings All,
Science & Public Policy is currently seeking reviewers for the following books.
[scisip] Chronicle article on altmetrics for academic impact
I suspect that many of you will find this article of interest: http://chronicle.com/article/As-Scholarship-Goes-Digital/130482/#disqus_thread.
With best wishes,
Britt
J.
[scisip] How do we know SciSIP research is having an impact?
I think this is a general quandary for all research that aims to have a broader impact, but especially for research that aims to have an impact on science policy.
I present our SciSIP-funded resear
Comparative Assessment of Peer Review Brussels workshop report
Report from the EU/US workshop on peer review: Assessing "broader impact" in research grant applications
Comparative Assessment of Peer Review (CAPR) EU/US workshop on peer review
This is the report of a workshop focusing on the use of broader societal impacts criteria as part of the review process at the European Commission.
2011 SciSIP book and dissertation prizes--nominations due March 1
Sent by: Zak Taylor This is a multi-part message in MIME format.--------------040008060307030001020000Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowedContent-Transfer-E
AEA RTD TIG Opportunities at Evaluation 2010
Sent by: "Araujo, John (CDC/OD/OADS)" This is a multi-part message in MIME format.------_=_NextPart_001_01CB7156.BBDABAD3Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-asciiContent-Transfer-En
